Notice: You are viewing a basic version of this page. Are you using a very old browser? If so, please consider upgrading


(Supported trial)

Upright maternal position in second stage labour in women with epidural analgesia; a randomised controlled trial.

Trial started: 2010  Trial ended: 2013

NPEU role: Randomisation service, statistical analysis and economic evaluation. Trial website: https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/bctu/trials/womens/bumpes/bumpes-trial.aspx

Summary

Objectives

In nulliparous women with epidural analgesia, does a policy of adopting an 'upright position' throughout second-stage labour increase the incidence of spontaneous vaginal birth (SVB) compared with a policy of adopting a 'lying-down' position?

Methods

A two-arm randomised controlled trial conducted in maternity units in England and Wales. Nulliparous women aged ? 16 years, at ? 37 weeks' gestation with singleton cephalic presentation and intending spontaneous vaginal birth were randomised during second-stage labour with an epidural providing effective pain relief to either an upright or a lying-down position.

Outcome measures

Primary outcome: Incidence of spontaneous vaginal birth (SVB). Secondary outcomes: Augmentation, interventions to maintain blood pressure, duration of labour, episiotomy, genital tract trauma, post-partum haemorrhage, maternal satisfaction, neonatal metabolic acidosis, 5-minute Apgar score of <4, resuscitation at birth and admission to a neonatal unit. At 1 year, outcomes for women included urinary or faecal incontinence, dyspareunia and health-related quality of life; infant outcomes included major morbidity. A cost-consequences analysis with a 1-year time horizon from an NHS perspective.

Results

Between October 2010 and January 2014, 3236 women were randomised from 41 centres in England and Wales. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of SVB between groups, with 35.2% of women achieving a SVB in the upright group, compared with 41.1% in the lying-down group (adjusted risk ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.94). There was no evidence of differences in most of the secondary maternal or neonatal outcomes, or in long-term outcomes at the 12-month follow-up. No significant overall cost differences were observed between upright and lying-down positions for mothers or their babies.

Conclusions

There is clear evidence of the benefit of adopting a lying-down position in second-stage labour in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia, with no apparent disadvantages in either short- or long-term outcomes for mother or baby, and this is cost neutral for the NHS.


Adapted from: Bick D, Briley A, Brocklehurst P, et al. A multicentre, randomised controlled trial of position during the late stages of labour in nulliparous women with an epidural: clinical effectiveness and an economic evaluation (BUMPES). Health Technology Assessment. 2017;21(65). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21650. © Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO 2017. Adapted for presentation on this website

Show Publications
  • The Epidural and Position Trial Collaborative Group. Upright versus lying down position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with low dose epidural: BUMPES randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2017;359.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4471
  • Bick D, Briley A, Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Juszczak E, Lynch L, et al. A multicentre, randomised controlled trial of position during the late stages of labour in nulliparous women with an epidural: clinical effectiveness and an economic evaluation (BUMPES). Health Technol Assess. 2017;21(65):1-176
    https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21650

Back to Trials Directory

Contact Us

No javascript available, can't display an interactive map.

Name
NPEU Clinical Trials Unit
Address
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU)
Nuffield Department of Population Health
University of Oxford
Old Road Campus

Oxford
OX3 7LF
Email
ctu@npeu.ox.ac.uk
Tel
01865 289700